Author

Keets

Browsing

So here I am watching the PAC-12 Championship Game between USC and Oregon, when an opinion I’ve held for years pops back up in my head: Why is USC pretty much irrelevant not only in college football, but basically every other major sport (football, basketball, baseball)? The football team is 5-0 and ranked 13th in the nation, but as I’m sitting here typing, they’re down by seven points to a 3-2 (unranked) Oregon team. I understand that anything can happen in a winner-take-all setting, but there’s no reason this game should even be close. But look, I’m not here to breakdown a single football game…it’s just baffling to me that they’re not a national championship contender every year in the major sports, when it should be so easy to recruit there.

If you’re unaware, USC was under NCAA sanctions for a few years (2010-2014) because of cheating within their football and basketball programs. But it’s not 2015. If it were, I’d cut them some slack for being fresh off of sanctions in which their football program lost 30 scholarships over a three-year span, and were banned from the postseason for two years. But, it’s 2020, and they’ve had plenty of time to recover.

And don’t think that I’m just piling on USC here. UCLA, although not as historically good at football as USC, should be, and I’ve never really understood why they’re not. Of the two schools, UCLA’s baseball team is the only national championship contender of the bunch (of the 3 major sports), but we all know baseball pails in comparison when compared to the attention and money football and basketball bring in. Which brings me to the real point of this article: how could it be so hard to recruit legit football and basketball players to USC and UCLA??

Like most things, it starts with the people in charge. It’s hard to win games with bad coaches, and based on the fact that USC and UCLA’s football and basketball teams haven’t been good in years (aside from Lonzo Ball’s one year at UCLA), the coaches aren’t living up to my standards. The real issue is that good coaches are so hard to find, and most of the good ones are locked down at SEC and ACC schools.

My final point is that USC and UCLA are two of the top 5 of the easiest schools to recruit to in the country. Here’s a little rundown on what makes both of these schools great options (from a male’s perspective):

  • Beautiful women everywhere
  • Located in Los Angeles (good chance Drake will go to games, close to beach, great weather, tourist destination)
  • Fantastic academic schools to hold degrees from
  • Actually a nice city to live in if you decide to stay after graduation.
  • Tinder game is strongest of any city I’ve been to in the U.S.
  • Literally down the street from famous shit (Rodeo Drive/Beverly Hills, L.A. Live, Hollywood Sign, Spearmint Rhino, Santa Monica Pier, and the list goes on…)

It was actually kinda hard to narrow down the above list to just a few things because there is so much shit to do in LA…especially for a college kid. I know athletes have a lot less free time to do things, but they still have time, trust me. They still have to be kids once in a while, and even if they don’t want to venture too far off campus, the frats and sororities aren’t too shabby either. Seriously, how in the fuck are schools in rural Alabama, South Carolina, Oklahoma, etc. able to steal Southern California’s top talent away from Los Angeles schools? Actually, that was a rhetorical question because we already know the answer. Like I said earlier, it’s the coaches. Schools in those other states I just mentioned have great programs that have been built by fantastic head coaches. The unfortunate reality is that the only way USC or UCLA will ever be relevant again is to either steal one of the big time coaches away from his/her school, or find a protege everyone else is sleeping on. Until then, the greater LA area will keep losing the local kids to Bama and Clemson. Take me back to the Reggie Bush and Pete Carroll era please.

It’s been a hell of a week for Rob Pelinka and Lakers Nation. Yesterday, LeBron James signed a two-year $85 million extension, and this morning, Anthony Davis signed a five-year $190 million extension with the Lakers (obviously). Before I get into things, I need to bring up the fact that this deal was announced by Woj at 4:40 AM Pacific time. I have two possible explanations as to how this deal was completed while the entire West Coast was dead asleep. Either they were up ALL NIGHT trying to get a deal done, which caused them to work into the early hours of Thursday OR Davis and Pelinka are on the East Coast. Either way, it’s pretty insane that the deal was announced when it was, mostly because it probably went seemingly unknown for hours until us LA folk started waking up. If I sounds unappreciative, I promise I’m not…waking up to this news rivaled waking up on Christmas morning.

The James and Davis deals (I would assume) ends an extremely eventful offseason for the Lakers after acquiring or resigning: Jared Dudley, KCP, Markieff Morris, Marc Gasol, Montrezl Harrel, Dennis Schroder, and Wesley Matthews.

The Lakers absolutely got better ahead of the 2020-2021 season, but it is worth noting they parted ways with a few key contributors from last season: Danny Green, Rajon Rondo, Avery Bradley, JaVale McGee, and Dwight Howard.

Out on Giannis

Now that the Lakers lineup seems to be pretty much set for this coming season, what do the massive extensions to James and Davis mean for the future of the Lakers? Well first of all, I think it pretty much takes them out of the Giannis sweepstakes. Because of the cap, it’s nearly impossible for them to sign Giannis as a free agent without other players (the most expensive being Davis and James) taking a significant pay cut. Their only real shot at getting him now would be a massive trade in which the Lakers would most likely need to trade away pretty much their entire roster. Seriously though, how many games do you think a three-man team made up of only LeBron, AD, and Giannis would win? I would honestly put the over/under at 50…and even that might be too low.

It would be absolutely insane if the Lakers added Giannis to the two-headed monster that is LeBron and AD, and for that reason, I am out. Even though LeBron is nearing 40, he’s still at the height of his powers, as evidenced by his 2020 Finals MVP award. I can’t in good conscience support adding arguably the best player in the league to this team. After LeBron is gone I have absolutely no problem with adding Giannis, but to add him now would be an embarrassment of riches that no other team in the NBA would be able to compete with.

The Future of LeBron James

My first thought when I saw LeBron only extended for another two years, I thought it meant he plans to retire after the 2022-2023 season. However, in constructing his deal the way he did, he’s actually making more money per season now than he was before, and it doesn’t conflict with the over-38 rule in the NBA’s collective bargaining agreement. Plus, he’ll be able to stick around for Bronny to enter the NBA (in 2023), should the rules change to allow players to straight out of high school to enter the NBA draft. Should Bronny even be good enough to get drafted straight out of high school, they’ll only be able to get him in the 2nd round anyway, since they traded away their 1st round picks until the end of time to the Pelicans.

It’s hard to imagine LeBron leaving LA since it was more of a career and lifestyle choice to move here in the first place, but should Bronny be a lottery pick when the 2023 draft rolls around, is 38/39 year-old LeBron willing to relocate to Charlotte or Detroit to play with his son? Unlikely. I still think we’ve got him until he decides to call it quits, but who knows how much longer we have him after 2023.

The Future of Anthony Davis

Anthony Davis is a Laker for life. Unlike in the MLB, where we’ve seen guys sign contracts in the double digits in terms of years, the NBA tops out around five or six years. Davis’ five year extension means the organization plans to keep him around for along time, and means AD is willing to give his prime years to the Lakers. Assuming he stays healthy and competitive, I don’t see them parting ways in the future. He’s already won a championship here, they’ll be competitive for years to come, and all indicators show he loves being in LA…and we love him too. He’s a great locker room guy and someone any GM would dream to build around in the post-LeBron years.

Unlike other guys like Russell Westbrook, James Harden, and John Wall, who have bad relations with teams they thought they’d be with forever after signing massive deals, AD is different, and his situation is different. The main factor being that he has already won a championship. Those other guys have been on frustrating teams that were never able to win the last game of the year, which lead to them being unhappy. Davis on the other hand, seems like he could not be happier to put on a Lakers uniform every day, hopefully for the rest of his career.

Yes, I mean it. The Dodgers just won the 2020 World Series title, but because people just love to hate, they’re putting an asterisk on this championship. I would love to have this season go down in the record books the same as any other, but if you want to put an asterisk next to 2020, I think it should be for different reasons. I believe this was the hardest year to win a championship in the history of MLB.

Let me break it down for ya:

  • Spring Training is canceled due to COVID-19 pandemic; no one is certain whether MLB will return in 2020.
  • Once MLB and players decide they can proceed with the season, there are lengthy salary negotiations that delay the start of the season until July.

And most importantly…

  • Postseason format is altered to include 16 total teams, including a first-round, best of 3 series.
  • NO off-days in the middle of the Wild Card Series, Division Series, and League Championship Series rounds.
  • With a condensed 60-game season, players (mostly pitchers) are fresher than they normally would be at the conclusion of the regular season, meaning they are more well-equipped for a playoff run.
  • No fans at games (until the playoffs) meant away teams were at an advantage because of significantly less crowd noise; greater ability to concentrate.

Remember, I still want the Dodgers to be treated equally amongst former World Series champs. Buttt, for those people that want to call this a fake season and asterisk my Boys in Blue, just take a look at the bullet points above. Luckily, MLB doesn’t take internet troll opinions into consideration when making rules for the season.

As shitty of a year this has been, as a diehard Laker and Dodger fan, I’m glad 2020 has redeemed itself slightly. I love this Dodgers team in particular because aside from Mookie and Pollock, all the stars are homegrown guys that have been with the team through countless devastating postseasons, including a couple of World Series losses. Most of all, it’s about time the GOAT Clayton Kershaw won a ring after having it denied by the cheaters in 2017. I mean how can you not be romantic about baseball?

The Dodgers are 2020 World Series champs forever and always.

“This is our year” – A common phrase coaches, players, and fans use to express the confidence they have in their team. It was also the closing remark of Dave Roberts’ speech following the Dodgers’ huge NLCS victory about 45 minutes ago. I’m too superstitious to ever say something as bold as “This is our year” about a team I deeply care about, but I fucking love the confidence by Roberts there.

The stage is now set. Dodgers vs. Rays in the 2020 World Series. To be completely honest, I couldn’t name one guy in the Rays starting lineup except for that guy Randy with the cowboy boots, but they weren’t the best team in the American League for no reason…they can play. Lead by Blake Snell and Tyler Glasnow, the Rays have one of the best pitching staffs in the league, and Moneyball’d their lineup to somehow score runs.

However, after just beating the Braves, who had one of the best pitching staff’s in the League this year, the Dodgers couldn’t have had a better pre-World Series matchup. Suffice to say, theoretically, if the Dodgers were able to hit that well against an elite group of  Braves pitchers, they should be able to be just as good (if not better) in the World Series. It’s even scarier that there isn’t a break in the Dodgers lineup, especially with a DH. In how many other MLB lineups would reigning MVP Cody Bellinger bat sixth? None, that’s how many. And by the time pitchers reach the bottom of the Dodgers lineup, they have Mookie Betts, Corey Seager (daddy), and Justin Turner waiting for them right around the corner. Their lineup is RELENTLESS. So, what this final round ultimately comes down to is whether or not the Dodgers pitching staff can out-duel an inferior group of no-named Rays hitters.

Look, the Dodgers didn’t have the best record in the Majors this year for no reason. They’re the best team on paper in the league (possibly ever) and now they’re riding high off of a HUGE game 7 victory. The Rays are also just off of a game 7 win, but they let the sub .500 Asterisks come back after being down 3-0 in the series. While it’s still a big deal they were able to win the series, the hype doesn’t compare to the Dodgers, who were down 3-1 and just won three games in a row.  I will tell ya that only having ONE day off before the World Series starts could factor into the Dodgers’ ability to start hot, but the way the game is played now, it might be better for them to have virtually no rest.  Rest vs. Rust. Ideally, I’d love if they had at least one more day off just so their pitching staff could recover a little more, but I think for the most part they’re in a solid position to come out strong.

Like I said earlier, I’ll never say “This is our year”, but let’s just say I certainly like our odds more than I did in the last World Series the Dodgers were in. Granted, hindsight is 20/20, but with the team built the way it is, it’s hard to bet against them. If the Dodgers could win the chip just a few weeks after the Lakers won theirs, I think it’s only right Garcetti says to hell with Covid and throws a joint parade the likes of which could never be topped. I’ll show up in a god damn hazmat suit if that’s what it takes.

Sorry, was getting a little ahead of myself there. 4 more. Globe Life Field. World Series. Game 1. Tuesday at 5:09 PM. Dodgers vs. Rays. Job’s not finished.

It was already a great day to be a baseball fan in general with the start of the 2020 MLB season just 24 hours away…but now it’s an incredible day for Dodgers fans in particular. Of course, I’m referring to the 12-year, $365 million extension Mookie Betts just signed with the Dodgers this afternoon. I’ll be the first to admit that the rich just got richer, being that the Dodgers already have a stacked lineup that features reigning NL MVP Cody Bellinger, alongside All-Stars Corey Seager, Justin Turner, Joc Pederson, and Max Muncy. However, as great as those guys are, nothing is promised in this league. That’s why when you have the opportunity to sign one of the top three players in baseball, you do so.

Since this news broke I’ve seen a lot of people say that the Dodgers are just buying a championship team, that they have an embarrassment of riches, that they don’t really need Mookie. Do these people have a point? Maybe. Do I think they’re just jealous? Absolutely.

Let’s take a little stroll down memory lane. The Dodgers traded for Yu Darvish in 2017, bolstering their starting rotation that already included Clayton Kershaw and Rich Hill, and Hyun-Jin Ryu. They won the N.L. Pennant, and you know the rest. Fast forward to 2018…the Dodgers trade for Manny Machado, adding another solid bat to a lineup that features most of the stars currently on their roster. Once again, they won the N.L. Pennant, but you know how that October ended. My point here is that it is really fucking hard to win the World Series, even if you have the best team on paper. This isn’t basketball, where one player can win you a championship. Baseball (usually) has a grueling 162-game schedule in which every single player down to the last guy in the bullpen needs to contribute in order to win a championship.

Now, will the Dodgers win more games with Mookie Betts in their lineup vs. without him? Yeah, probably! All I’m trying to say is that his addition doesn’t guarantee a championship. And until the Dodgers do win a championship, I don’t want to hear it.

Now that I’ve dealt with the haters, I just want to say that this was undoubtedly the most exciting thing that’s happened to me in at least five months, and arguably the best Dodgers moment since Puig’s homer in the 2018 World Series. I’m still so caught up in Betts’ signing that I’m not even considering what this means for other expensive Dodgers like Bellinger, Seager, Kershaw, and Turner, (who are all due to get paid soon), or whether or not I think we’ll even finish this baseball season once it starts. I’m just enjoying the moment and hoping there isn’t an opt-out clause after three years or some shit.

Regardless of who you root for, just be excited that baseball is back in our lives as of 7 P.M. EST tomorrow and that hopefully, you’re not a Red Sox fan.

Judd Apatow’s new film, The King of Staten Island, premiered today On-Demand with Pete Davidson leading a cast that also includes Marisa Tomei, Bill Burr, and Steve Buscemi. Davidson, who also co-wrote the movie with Apatow and Dave Sirus, stars as 24-year-old deadbeat Scott Carlin, who has dealt with depression, among other issues, since his father (who was a firefighter) died in a fire when Scott was a child. This movie is also semi-autobiographical and is loosely based on Pete Davidson’s experiences, having grown up on Staten Island and losing his real dad, Scott, on 9/11 . If you’re familiar with any of Davidson’s comedy or appearances over the years, you’d know he talks pretty openly about his father’s death, which much like in the movie, involves a dark sense of humor as his way to cope. It’s also interesting that as much as Davidson has shit on Staten Island in the past, it’s clear after watching this movie that he appreciates the lessons he learned by being from there. It’s where he grew up, where his family is from, it’ll always be apart of him, and this movie was, in a strange way, a love letter to his hometown.

From the get-go, it’s obvious that Scott is a total piece of shit. He pretty much just smokes weed and hangs out at his friend’s house all day, which sounds cool until you realize none of them seem to have jobs. I’m not a parent, but if I were, there’s no way in hell I’d let my 24-year-old son do nothing all day and live rent-free. So as much as Scott is to blame for his lack of ambition, his mom, Margie (Marisa Tomei) is equally responsible.

Scott makes two exceptionally bad choices over the course of the movie. The first is when he thinks it’s a great idea to give a random 9 year old boy a tattoo. Let me set the scene. Scott, an aspiring tattoo artist, is with his three best friends at the beach giving tattoos when a little kid walks up to them and says he wants one. A sane person would know it’s not right to permanently ink up a third-grader, but since it seems like he doesn’t have a great track record of making solid decisions in the past, Scott figures he needs the practice and begins to tatt. As idiotic as that kid was, after just a few seconds he gets scared and runs away with just a two-inch-long black line on the exterior of his arm, so at least he had some sense.

Next thing we know, the kid’s dad, Ray (Bill Burr), is on Scott’s front porch shouting at Margie and demanding that she pay to have the tattoo removed from his son’s arm. My biggest question this entire scene was “how the hell did he find out where Scott lives?” Luckily, Margie thought the same thing as me, but when she asks him how he found their house he said “I have my ways”. Look, unless he was Ethan Hunt in disguise, how the hell would he be able to track down some random guy from the beach (that he never saw) on all of Staten Island? However, once cooler heads prevailed, Ray comes back to the house and asks Margie out for a cup of coffee, to which she accepts. Thus sparked a magnificent love that she had been longing for since her husband’s passing, letting Scott off the hook for an otherwise terrible decision.

Scott’s other bad (worse) choice is involving himself in a robbery with his three best friends that I mentioned earlier. Remember, none of them seem to have jobs aside from selling drugs, so what is their bright idea? Rob a pharmacy of course! Luckily, Scott thinks it’s stupid to rob a pharmacy too, so his friends just make him the lookout. Only, he’s the world’s worst lookout. While his friends are in the store committing a very serious crime, Scott, who suffers from depression and anxiety, is outside playing games on his phone. Simultaneously, the owners of the pharmacy show up and shoot, but don’t kill one of the guys, and a few seconds later the cops show up and arrest his other two friends. Luckily Scott gets away and his friends don’t rat him out, but as a viewer, it’s still hard for me to believe that in that tense of a situation he would be on his phone playing games.

What’s confusing about the robbery in terms of the film’s plot, is that it didn’t even serve as Scott’s wakeup call to get his act together. I’d like to think that watching his three best friends go to jail would’ve whipped him into shape, but it took getting in a fight with Ray and his mother kicking him out of the house for him to finally get it together. And that’s really where the story starts…which is interesting because that happened nearly 3/4 of the way through the movie.

As funny and charming as The King of Staten Island was, I do feel like it dragged a bit in the middle. We understood that Scott was a loser, but we were waiting for him to turn the corner, and it felt like we had to wait about 25 minutes too long for that to happen. As cute as Ray’s kids were, did we really need all the scenes with Scott walking them to school? Or the whole trip to his sister’s college? It’s not like he ended up enrolling at the school, so what was the point of showing us that he got along so well with all of the college kids? Maybe they intended the ending to be ambiguous, but I want to know what Scott is going to do with his life!

Will he be a firefighter? Well, he’s super scrawny and has A.D.D. so the studying and physical part of that job will be a challenge, so I’m going to cross that off the list.

Will he go to college? He didn’t graduate high school and seems uninterested with continuing his education on account of the A.D.D. (mentioned earlier), so that’s probably a no too.

Will he become a tattoo artist? This is what I don’t understand about the entire “tattoo artist” storyline. The whole movie, all we see are the shitty tattoos he does on his friends and his mom, leading us to believe that he’s not good, and it’s a far-fetched dream. But later in the movie, he draws an utterly flawless picture of Ice Flash, which then leads us to believe that he’s really good and that the tattoo artist dream might be conceivable? But THEN Ray lets him tattoo all over his back, and most of them are terrible, bringing me back to the thought that he could never be a tattoo artist.

Regardless, I think that Pete Davidson’s performance has officially established him as more than just a sketch-show and stand-up comedian. I was hesitant about him carrying a movie, being that he had never done it before and I never considered him a fantastic actor, but I think his relation to the character carried his performance and made it more authentic…plus it didn’t hurt to have Bill Burr, Steve Buscemi, and Marisa Tomei as costars. In all honesty, I don’t think the movie works without Burr. The energy he brought to the role is exactly what was needed, especially during the argumentative scenes.

At the end of the movie, I was clearly optimistic about his future with Kelsey (Bel Powley), but I still have no idea how he’s going to make money. There’s nothing wrong with being the custodian of the fire department, but don’t they want us to believe he’s meant for bigger and better things? I would like to think so.

Rating: 7.2/10

Despite very little (basically zero) anticipation, the 2020 MLB Draft kicked off yesterday, giving us the first real baseball-related content in months. The MLB draft has never received the same recognition or hype as the NBA and NFL drafts, understandably so, but I’m still one of the proud die-hard baseball fans that does get excited for it. However, the enthusiasm for this year’s draft did not match previous years’ for a couple of reasons:

  1. Society has been concerned with racial injustice the past couple of weeks, as it should’ve been. Social media has been absolutely dominated by posts about racial and class inequality lately, so everything not related to that was pretty much filtered out of everyone’s timeline.
  2. I’m sure MLB Network and ESPN have been reminding viewers about the draft for weeks now, but I, along with many people, have not been watching sports networks – what’s the point? ESPN talk shows are hardly bearable when there are actual sports on, so I can’t imagine how many topics they’ve recycled over the last few months. Probably just more debates about why MJ is the goat and how Tom Brady keeps his body in such great shape at his age – we’ve heard it all before.
  3. MLB’s social media team did a terrible job promoting it. Leading up to the draft, the @MLB Instagram account only posted three times, all of which were within the same 24-hour period. They should’ve been hyping this thing up for WEEKS! There is literally nothing else to talk about in the baseball world, so why wouldn’t they have been reminding us about the draft and promoting the top prospects as much as possible? Just another example of MLB fumbling the bag in regards to growing the game.

Even though MLB could have done a much better job of promotion leading up to the draft, now that it’s started, I think it’s what was needed to advance negotiations between the owners and players for the 2020 season. I’ve been pessimistic about there being a 2020 MLB season at all since it seems like the two sides are so far apart on the salary issue, but since the draft started, I have confidence that a deal will be met. Going online and seeing that there is actual baseball news along with player highlights and the reaction videos from guys getting drafted, things just feel right.

How could the video above not get you excited for baseball?? Even though most of these guys won’t reach the majors for a couple of years, it still gets me fired up for the future of the sport and makes me want the MLB back right now. I know that MLB players and owners share my passion for this game, but I hope they do the right thing and reach an agreement. As fucked up as this year has been so far, if the players and owners could just give a little bit and bring baseball back this year, it would help in establishing at least some sense of normalcy to the world.

Former NFL running back Arian Foster was featured in an interview with Big Cat and PFT Commenter on today’s episode of Pardon My Take. As you may remember, Foster was among the group of NFL players, along with Colin Kaepernick, who knelt during the national anthem in 2016 to protest against police brutality and racial inequality. Clearly, he’s been at the forefront of addressing racial issues these past few years, so I was excited to listen to his banter with Big Cat and PFT (who are a couple of white guys, just FYI), especially given the current state of affairs in America.

I’d first like to give credit to Big Cat and PFT who, despite knowing that they’d probably receive some backlash for having Foster on the show to discuss racial issues, since PMT is supposed to be a show where people can escape the problems facing the real world, had him on anyway. Plus, given the comments I’ve seen in the Barstool blog’s comments section over the years, I think it’s fair to assume that a good chunk of PMT‘s listeners/Barstool supporters don’t share the same sympathies with the Black Lives Matter movement that Big Cat and PFT do. However, due to the latest civil unrest resulting from the unjust killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, even if you disagree with the protests, it’s extremely beneficial to expand your world view and at least understand where BLM is coming from.

These are my main takeaways from Foster’s interview:

The NFL (and all sports leagues) needs to be more proactive, not reactive.

Foster brought up the example of Ray Rice, who was indefinitely suspended from the league because of a domestic violence incident with his then-fiancee. He wrote a long letter and tried to contact Roger Goodell several times in hopes of having a conversation regarding domestic violence, but none of his attempts in contacting the commissioner were successful.

You have an opportunity to have a national conversation about domestic violence, because domestic violence isn’t an NFL football player problem…cops do it, firemen do it, military people do it, doctors do it. Domestic violence is a civil rights issue.

– Arian Foster on “Pardon My Take”

In one sense, I understand where the NFL is coming from…they’re just a football league. Is it really their place to speak out regarding social issues involving domestic violence, race, sexual orientation, etc.? At the end of the day, the NFL is a business, and like any business, it is their prerogative to make as much money as possible, which usually does not include pissing off fan bases across the league. However, the NFL is not a business like Microsoft and Apple, where you couldn’t name more than three people who work there. The NFL’s employees are world-famous athletes who (like it or not) carry the enormous responsibility of being role models for the youth of this world. And in being such, it’s important that the NFL is aware that when their players do engage in unacceptable behavior, they’re at the forefront of the conversation on a national stage and set regulations in place to dissuade those behaviors. 

Similarly, he brought up the fact that Colin Kaepernick has been blackballed from the NFL, even though he shares the same ideals as the protesters right now, which the NFL now shares sentiments with. It just makes you think about how businesses will only support an issue when it’s convenient for them to do so. Here is the NFL’s official statement regarding the protests:

Feelings over facts.

[Polling] does not account for antecdotes. How can you quantify a police officer roughing you up? How can you quantify that? Who do you report it to? Where is that in your data? It’s not. How can you quantify decades of that?…That’s why police relations in inner-city communities are bad.

– Arian Foster on “Pardon My Take”

Being on the internet as much as I am, I see a lot of statistics about crime, and I’ll admit that I believe a lot of what I see. However, as I learned today, it’s impossible to quantify feelings in a database. Foster told a story about how he and his father were pulled over by a police officer on a road trip and were asked to exit their vehicle although they had done nothing wrong. The officer went on to empty their suitcases (presumably looking for contraband) and when he didn’t find anything, he told them they were free to go. I’m sure that if 99% of the officers on duty that day pulled up behind Foster’s car, nothing would’ve happened, but that 1% is what creates the distrust in the police department amongst the black community. And that’s something that can’t be quantified into a statistic.

I don’t agree with Foster that looting and destruction of property is okay.

You can rationalize the looting and destruction of property that we’ve seen across America the past few days as an inevitability in reaction to years of racial inequality, but I think it’s just idiots taking advantage of the situation. I saw businesses in Los Angeles and Santa Monica ravaged by looters over the weekend, and it completely contradicts the message of the protest.

Time after time again in American history…rioting and looting caused change in America.

I’m not an advocate for looting, I’m not an advocate for burning the building, but I’m also not saying “don’t burn the buildings”. I’m saying “feel how you feel”. Like, “fuck that building!”

– Arian Foster on “Pardon My Take”

I’m pretty sure that if you’re faced with the question “should I burn down this building?”, and your response is “feel how you feel”, you are 100% condoning that action. I understand that people are upset about George Floyd’s wrongful death, but in what way is looting Nordstrom’s, CVS Pharmacy, and small businesses doing anything to help the situation? If you think that it’ll bring more attention to the issue than hundreds of people marching down PCH shouting “BLACK LIVES MATTER!”, you’re wrong. Any group of people that large will attract just as much attention to the issue, except no laws will be broken in the process and you’ll preserve the community.

Also, shoutout to the people of Santa Monica who were already out cleaning the streets this morning after all the destruction yesterday; you have somewhat restored my faith in society.

Fix your world. Small victories inspire change

All you can do is your part – fix your world…Those small victories add up over time.

– Arian Foster on “Pardon My Take”

To end on a somewhat positive note (as corny as this is), be the change you want to see in the world. It’s hard to change other people’s perspectives and opinions on a large scale, but if you can address them and make changes within your own life, you’ve already made a difference. But, the first thing you have to do is acknowledge your own prejudices.

If you’re one of those people who say “I don’t see color” then you’re a fucking liar. That’s the most ignorant thing you can say. Maybe it’s time we need to have a conversation with ourselves and say “yes these are the elements of my life – these are the views that I have that contain harmful prejudices or elements of racism and here’s how they can be changed.”

It’s not easy to admit to yourself that you aren’t as open-minded or accepting of all people and cultures as you’d like, but the first step in becoming a better human is just being able to admit that to yourself. Yeah, I have prejudices too…but like PFT said, we all do! It’s just important to be mindful of those prejudices and not act on them, especially when they could be detrimental to someone around you or even yourself.

To let the cat out of the bag here, I am not black, so I will never know what it’s like to be black in America. However, after listening to Arian Foster’s interview, I’m more mindful now than ever that my experience in this country has been a lot different than others, and it’s important to keep that in mind regarding these protests. Not only are the protesters well within their rights to do so, but as long as it doesn’t get violent (some would argue violence is necessary), it sends a much-needed message to those in power that unlawful police brutality against racial minorities is detrimental to society and needs to be eliminated. And if you disagree with that last statement, I’d implore you to listen to Foster’s interview on Pardon My Take if you haven’t already and/or seek professional counseling because you have some deep-seated issues that really need addressing.

With the status of Major League Baseball everchanging due to the coronavirus pandemic, this article will provide you with the most up-to-date news as it happens. I will update this article when necessary, i.e. when any major news about the 2020 season is released. As of June 22nd, 2020, here is what you need to know:

June 22nd, 2020:

We will have baseball in 2020!!!

June 15th, 2020:

I hope Manfred is just trying to knock some sense into these players and reach a deal because if not, this season is fucked.

June 12th, 2020:

At this point, it’s just a neverending cycle.

 

June 9th, 2020:

MLBPA makes a proposal for an 89-game season with full prorated salary and expanded playoffs:

June 3rd, 2020:

A 50-game season is looking more likely, as MLB has rejected MLBPA’s 114-game season proposal.

June 1st, 2020:

MLB is highly considering 50-game schedule with full prorated salaries:

May 31, 2020:
  • The MLBPA proposes a 114-game season, ending October 31st. See below for the full story:

May 28, 2020:
  • While in negotiations with the MLBPA, MLB released the following plan for salary cuts for the 2020 season:

  • As you can see, MLB owners really don’t want to pay their players, and they are offering them pennies on the dollar in exchange for playing this year. In response, Nationals star pitcher Max Scherzer posted the following on Twitter on behalf of the MLBPA:

It’s pretty clear that the overwhelming majority of MLB players considered MLB’s proposal a slap in the face and are not willing to even entertain that offer. Of course, it’s worth noting that the guys who are more than likely calling the shots on behalf of the players are the ones with multi-million dollar contracts. The up-and-coming players (not as rich) would probably be more willing to work with MLB here because they want that big-league exposure (assuming rosters sizes are increased) and their salaries won’t be diminished, relatively speaking, compared to guys like Scherzer.

  • Following up with Scherzer’s tweet, the MLBPA is looking to counter MLB’s proposal and ask for a 100+ games and full prorated salaries (refer to above tweet for salary reference):

  • Unwilling to pay players, who might’ve been cut at the end of spring training regardless, their stipend of $400/week, Minor League Baseball cut hundreds of players on May 28. That number is expected to surpass 1,000 in the coming days and just shows how much of a toll the coronavirus pandemic has had on baseball as a whole. From a business perspective, it makes sense to “trim the fat”, but it’s still unfortunate to see that guys who were still chasing their dream and rely on their MiLB salary for their main source of income are now apart of the millions of unemployed Americans. Although, they might make more on unemployment than they did playing for MiLB.

Adam Sandler has made some of the most popular movies of the last 25 years and is as “A-list” as a celebrity can get. His movies usually have slightly unbelievable plotlines, which is probably what makes them so popular. I mean, who wouldn’t want to see a movie about a failed hockey player who becomes one of the best professional golfers, or a 30-something-year-old mentally challenged waterboy who realizes his football potential and becomes the best defensive player in the country? However, I think that because Sandler’s movies are already ridiculous to begin with, it makes it easier to believe that even as a remarkably average-looking (dare I say “goofy”) man, he somehow always has an insanely hot wife/significant other. For the sake of this article, I will also include women who Sandler’s character had sexual relations with or but based on the ending, implied that they live happily ever after.

5. Kate Beckinsale, Click (2006)

Click (2006)

Pin on film film films

4. Emmanuelle Chriqui,You Don’t Mess with the Zohan (2008)

You Don't Mess with the Zohan (2008)

3. Salma Hayek, Grown Ups (2010)

Pin on Celebrity

Salma at grown ups 2! #Salm | SalmaHayek USA (With images) | Salma ...

2. Jessica Biel, I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry (2007)

Now if I was ranking Sandler’s love interests by their hottest individual scenes in his movies, Biel would’ve won hands-down. This might even be the best scene in cinematic history. However, credit to me for putting biases aside and not letting the screenplay influence the rankings.

Jessica Biel in the film 'I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry ...

I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry (2007)

1. Brooklyn Decker, Just Go With It (2011)

It literally does not get better than this. And even though they did not end up together in the end, they were pretty much engaged for 95% of the movie.

Brooklyn Decker - JUST GO WITH IT - YouTube

Honorable Mentions:

Bridgette Wilson-Sampras, Billy Madison (1995)

Here's What The Cast Of "Billy Madison" Looks Like Now (With ...

Goddammit Billy, the Spanish Armada was in 1588! I’ll never forgive him for getting this wrong.

Bridgette Wilson with suspenders in "Billy Madison" (With images ...

Jennifer Aniston, Just Go With It (2011)

Adam Sandler really went 2/2 in this movie, sheesh.

Just Go With It (2011) - Let's Get Married! Scene (9/10 ...

Just Go with It (2011)

I would LOVE to know what Jackie Sandler, Adam’s wife in real life, thinks about all the hot women he’s been able to make out with over the years in movies. Unless Sandler played a millionaire in every movie, it’s highly unlikely that he’d land any of these women in real life. I’d say the most believable of his movie wives is Salma Hayek in Grown Ups because they met when they were young, presumably when Sandler was in much better shape…plus he had game. What Sandler’s roles have done above all else is provide some hope to all the average-looking guys out there with astronomical standards. Never settle, kings. Never settle.